![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Untitled
editThis is rediculous. I take a moment to get my referecnes straight and you are already planning on deleting the article? How about giving a person the benefit of the doubt for more than 10 minutes?
Or how about marking it a stub like the companion article? How about doing your duty and actually explaining the stub process? I would look into it myself but it seems that the article I am working on will be deleted long before I figure out how that works.
- Hi Grauenwolf! Please don't get angry. Instead, add some context to the article so that the tag no longer applies. Right now, despite the addition of a stub tag and a reference, the best I can make out is that a debile is a part of a fencing foil. Not even sure if that's correct.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- My applogies. I didn't mean to lose my temper.Grauenwolf 04:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)