Talk:December 1910 United Kingdom general election

[Untitled]

The votes percentage only adds up to 68.9% Where is the rest?? Fig 09:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

They appear to have been calculated on an incorrect basis. I'll blank them until correct figures are found. Warofdreams talk 16:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:John Redmond.jpg

The image Image:John Redmond.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Dec 1910 UK Election Map.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Dec 1910 UK Election Map.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Infobox cotent

Another editor recently decided to delete the AfIL entry in this section I assume because the "election box is a summary, clear cut off point". A similar action was taken to delete elements of the Infobox for UKGE J1910, 1922 and 1923. I think the editor was right to do so in the case of 1922 and 1923 but I am not convinced that the "clear cut off point" used is either clear cut or justified. For a full explanation, see the talkpage of January 1910. Graemp (talk) 10:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United Kingdom general election, December 1910. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070810223744/http://www.labour-party.org.uk:80/manifestos/1910/dec/1910-dec-labour-manifesto.shtml to http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1910/dec/1910-dec-labour-manifesto.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)