This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Declan Napier is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
First thing that catches my eye is the image. I'd be surprised if it qualified as fair use.
Dates should not be open ended (2007-). Use something like "2010-present" or "2010 onwards".
Done avoid repetition of "role", especially in the lead
Done name "the series" for its first mention in "character creation"
I have some concerns over the references:
DoneThe linking of them is inconsistent- you should link everything in the |work= field unless it doens;t have an article
They lack |publisher= fields which aren't essential for GA and publication dates which are
Done The Neighbours official website and Perfectblend are not reliable sources
I'm willing to leave this open as long as improvements are being made but you might struggle to find more reliable sources. DoneYou could try imdb, which is marginally more reliable and I suggest a google news archive search for any newspaper articles etc that might help. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I changed the heading to "2007 onwards", the format advised by WP:OTHERDATE (part of the MoS). Although it's not one of the areas of the MoS required for GA, it's my opinion that it looks better than a dash (long or short). As for the image, the criteria only require that it's appropriately tagged, which it is, so, although it raises an eyebrow, it doesn't hold it back from GA. Thus, I'm happy to pass this. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
Done avoid repetition of "role", especially in the lead
DoneYou could try imdb, which is marginally more reliable and I suggest a google news archive search for any newspaper articles etc that might help. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)