Talk:Deidre Willmott
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Reinstated the word "controversial"
editI have reinstated the word contorversial in "she was a controversial Chief of Staff", as this is supported by the references. If you disagree please discuss here before taking further action. --Design (talk) 12:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Cameron Morse
editIn April 2011 Crikey published an article "FMG edits history while video of Twiggy’s “superb” native title meeting taken down" by Tom Cowie [1] which includes reference to edits by Cameron Morse of Wikipedia articel about FMG, Andrew Forrest, and Deidre Willmott. --Design (talk) 13:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Notability
editDiscussion of notability has been moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deidre Willmott. Twigfan (talk) 00:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
References
editNoting that I've proposed the article for deletion, can somebody go through the references and alter the references to { { cite web | url = | title = | date = } }. I'm not doing this because I'm subsuming the article will be deleted as non-notable. Twigfan (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
"Withdrawing" her candidacy
editThe article says the Willmott "withdrew" her candidacy for state election. However this article suggests that "the rug was pulled from beneath her when the political resurrection of Colin Barnett forced her to stand aside". That sounds like a forced resignation... Twigfan (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- The source does not say she was forced to resign. You're interpreting the text and adding your own meaning to it. Until you have a WP:RS that says she was forced to resign, it should not be in the text. --LauraHale (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but what was she forced to do then? Quoting the article again:
- the rug was pulled from beneath her when the political resurrection of Colin Barnett forced her to stand aside.
- It says, [Deidre Willmott] was... forced... to stand aside
- Okay, right. She wasn't forced to resign. She was forced to stand aside. What I want to know, is what's the difference? Twigfan (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but what was she forced to do then? Quoting the article again:
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Deidre Willmott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108115717/http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/willmott-to-stand-down-as-cottesloe-candidate-20080806-3r0x.html to http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/willmott-to-stand-down-as-cottesloe-candidate-20080806-3r0x.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120518001944/http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Lists/Statements/DispForm.aspx?ID=109410 to http://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Lists/Statements/DispForm.aspx?ID=109410
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)