Talk:Del Toro
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 6 March 2018
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 6 March 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus that Del Toro (surname) is the primary topic of "Del Toro," and therefore no consensus to move the pages as proposed at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
– Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Most uses here are partial terms (except for Del Toro Lake and its river). © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose the surname isn't particularly notable. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think you are a reliable editor that can question notability. Literally there are dozens of articles created by you that fail basic N criteria. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 17:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Argue based on the merits or otherwise of your nomination, but don't attack other editors who disagree. Shadow007 (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- None of your business. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 16:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Do not attack In ictu oculi, Tbhotch. There is no reason for it. CookieMonster755✉ 00:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose No evidence of primacy presented. Shadow007 (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Shadow007: no evidence of lack of primacy either. Page views + external sources support it. Plus, if I add Guillermo's name sources triple. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 17:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- None of which you referred to in your reasons for nominating (and even now you do not link to the page view statistics). It is not enough to just say it is primary and leave people to go find out if it is. You are the nominator, you need to persuade for a consensus change. Shadow007 (talk) 22:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yet, you still opposing. So, this is not about evidence anyway. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 16:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – I fail to see how the Google Books provide substantial weight that the surname is primary topic. Disambiguation seems to be the best option. CookieMonster755✉ 01:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)