Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tinton5 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Well-written:
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (prose) |
Prose used throughout/Grammar, spelling, punctuation |
✓ Pass
|
(b) (MoS) |
MoS used throughout |
✓ Pass
|
- Verifiable with no original research:
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (references) |
References are factual and accurate |
✓ Pass
|
(b) (citations to reliable sources) |
Reliable sources are used throughout |
✓ Pass
|
(c) (original research) |
No original research |
✓ Pass
|
- Broad in its coverage:
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (major aspects) |
Covers entirely all vital areas of the article |
✓ Pass
|
(b) (focused) |
Clearly written and to the point |
✓ Pass
|
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes |
Result
|
Article passes here as well |
✓ Pass
|
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Notes |
Result
|
No edit wars. |
✓ Pass
|
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
Criteria |
Notes |
Result
|
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) |
Many, many relevant images, fair use as well |
✓ Pass
|
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) |
Images and captions are relevant and appropriate |
✓ Pass
|
Result |
Notes
|
✓ Pass |
Very well written article, which meets GA criteria
|
This article meets GA criteria. Tinton5 (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply