Talk:Delaware Route 1/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tinton5 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tinton5 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit
  1. Well-written:
  2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) Prose used throughout/Grammar, spelling, punctuation  Pass
    (b) (MoS) MoS used throughout  Pass
  3. Verifiable with no original research:
  4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) References are factual and accurate  Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Reliable sources are used throughout  Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research  Pass
  5. Broad in its coverage:
  6. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) Covers entirely all vital areas of the article  Pass
    (b) (focused) Clearly written and to the point  Pass
  7. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  8. Notes Result
    Article passes here as well  Pass
  9. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  10. Notes Result
    No edit wars.  Pass
  11. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  12. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Many, many relevant images, fair use as well  Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Images and captions are relevant and appropriate  Pass

Result

edit
Result Notes
 Pass Very well written article, which meets GA criteria

Final comments

edit

This article meets GA criteria. Tinton5 (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply