Talk:Delaware Route 4

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Canadian Paul in topic GA Review
Good articleDelaware Route 4 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 4, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 4/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Canadian Paul (talk · contribs) 14:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll give this one a look, hopefully later today. Canadian Paul 14:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Well, once again I performed some minor copyedits, but otherwise this article seems to satisfy the GA criteria, so I will go ahead and pass it. Congratulations and thank you again for all your work! Canadian Paul 21:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply