Talk:Delay insensitive circuit

history

The idea of Dual rail encoding is preceded and was published much before the patent quoted. Don't pollute wikipedia...

You may be right. Could you tell us more? Where was it published (wp:v)? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

rename

Please rename this page with "delay-insensitive circuit" : add a hyphen as there is compound adjective Baba Arouj (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

improve

Nobody including Alain Martin disputes that useful DI circuits can be built from modules that contain unexposed isochronic forks internally, as in the 1960's Macromodules project. Tom Verhoeff notes in his doctoral dissertation that even simple logic gates such as an inverter depend on internal isochronic forks to function. QDI circuits are assumed in Martin's cited "Limitations" paper to be built from forks and logic gates, so there's no rational justification to consider them any less "limited" than DI circuits built from non-standard components. Would you Wikipedia guys be cool with an outsider fixing this article or do you like it the way it is? 78.32.159.157 (talk) 23:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). --DavidCary (talk) 13:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)