Talk:Deli Mike

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Sammi Brie in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk14:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Styyx (talk). Self-nominated at 17:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • Comments by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
  • Other problems:  
QPQ: None required.

Overall:     New article that is long enough. The hook is interesting and thankfully nothing happened to it while it was operative. Neutral and interesting. QPQ unneeded. I AGF in the Turkish sources and the Google Translation I did. (CC) Tbhotch 03:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Promoting the main hook to Prep 7Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Spelling

edit

Hi @Styyx:, @Bazza 7:, @Sca: - thanks for your comments on the DYK talk page relating to this article. I had a look at the links suggested, but found another one which I think is more appropriate - MOS:UNIT. I've changed the article to use "metre" based on my reading of that. Also, the reference itself, although in Turkish, uses the word "metre". I can't decide whether the article should use British or American English in general, but I can't find any other text in the article which would change anyway. Cheers, Kiwipete (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC).Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Deli Mike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Just some copy fixes and alt text and you're good to go. Didn't expect a GA on an individual plane, but here we are! 7-day hold for Styyx. Ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:52, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes

edit
  • In late 1980s → "In the late 1980s"
      Done
  • "phased-out" should not be hyphenated
      Done
  • Change contraction "would've" to "would have"
      Done
  • option for further five → "option for a further five"
      Done
  • Frequent problems with the aircraft include the reading light of a completely different passenger turning on when the button is pressed and the same issue also exists with the button used to call a crew member Add comma after "pressed". More: User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences
      Done
  • re-configured and lay-out remove dashes
      Done
  • There were initial speculations — "There was initial speculation"; this is not plural in English
      Done
  • "sistership" is not one word in English, but the claim from [5] does check out that three other A340s from the order were used as restaurants and venues. I'd say "as had previously happened to three sister aircraft".
      Done
  • The technicians also removed and re-installed all systems, and reset — another commas in sentences info, drop this comma. also, "reinstalled", no hyphen
      Done
  • when many others are grounded — maybe "were" grounded? there's definitely a tense issue here
      Done; also replaced "when" with "while".
  • Bora Erdin of pro-opposition newspaper Sözcü also added that the airline made "no clarification as to why the problematic plane [Deli Mike] was used persistently while unproblematic ones were on the ground", and pointed out to the frequent issue of the landing gear not retracting after take-off, causing the aircraft to return to the origin airport. Several items:
  • Remove comma after the quote (another commas in sentences issue)
  Done
  • "and pointed out to" might be better parsed as "and highlighted"
  Done
  • Takeoff is one word
  Done

Source spot checks

edit

I do not speak or read Turkish, so sources are being run through Google Translate to check. The four I chose do check out.

  • [5] Use of sister aircraft as restaurants: Checks out to source.
  • [7] Checks out for fleet overhaul/temporary grounding of some aircraft after a fall in demand
  • [10] Removal of livery
  • [11] Ferrying to Johannesburg

Other issues

edit
  • References are archived.
  • Earwig has no issues whatsoever, owing to the exclusively non-English sourcing.
  • Images outside of the infobox need alt text. They all have permission or are otherwise freely licensed.
      Added alt texts, only couldn't find anything the first one so it's now |alt=refer to caption.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.