Talk:Delirious?

Untitled

The whole anagram thing is a bit of a stretch in my opinion.

--EthanSudman 03:58, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

But nevertheless true. Jon Thatcher came up with "Audio Lessonover" after feeding the phrase "Radio One Loves Us" into an anagram program on his laptop whilst travelling in the tour bus. I have been unable to find a cite for this.

Stuart Garrard

Am i the only one that thinks that Stu G should Be added to the List of Gibson Players Page. If you think so Please post your support in the discussion section of that page (it's at the top of the list).173.104.56.160 (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Added disambiguation page

I had a heck of a time finding the page for Delirious, the pro wrestler, since "Delirious" goes straight here. There was a hatnote directing to "delirium," which didn't help much, so I created a "Delirious (disambiguation)" page and changed the hatnote to link to that instead. I kind of think that the term "Delirious" should go straight to the disambiguation page (since both the Christian band and the wrestler are pretty obscure outside of their own spheres), but that's beyond my power right now. Anyone else? Karl Freske 10:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

I think this page sums up this band and it was written well. Thank you.

King of Fools: songs that "gained anthemic status"

I removed the reference to I could sing of your love forever from this list and replaced it with White Ribbon Day. It's arguably true that WRD didn't "gain anthemic status" but ICSOYLF wasn't even on the KOF album... Waggers 10:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

X Worship 2006

One may want to add to this article the fact that this band has a song on this compilation cd. -EdGl 00:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

INDIA

HEY IS IT TRUE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO COME TO Bangalore, INDIA IN THE NEXT YEAR??? rencin24

I have replied on the above user's talk page here. --3M163//Complete Geek 09:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Concert Reviews

The Phantom Tollbooth features six reviews of Delirious? concerts, dating back to 1998. Dan, the CowMan 05:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Cross Rhythms has several from roughly 2003 onwards; JFH may have some, too. --3M163//Complete Geek

Fair use rationale for Image:NOW IS THE TIME.jpg

Image:NOW IS THE TIME.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Logo v text

The use of a logo, with no "alt" attribute, rather than the text name which I used and which has just been reverted, not only breaks the hCard microformat, but is inaccessible. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 15:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Opening Paragraph

I don't think the opening paragraph is the place for, "Stu G is the only member not related to the others by blood or marriage. Martin, Stewart, and Tim are each married to one of Jon's three sisters." --86.136.188.125 18:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, I've moved it accordingly. Next time, please feel free to be bold! Waggers 12:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

• "Jeffries 03" :
  • {{cite book |last=Jeffries |first=Stan |title=The Encyclopedia of World Pop Music, 1980-2001 |year=2003 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=[[Westport, Connecticut|Westport]], [[Connecticut]] |isbn=0-313-31547-7 |pages=48-50}}
  • {{cite book |last=Jeffries |first=Stan |title=The Encyclopedia of World Pop Music |year=2003 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=[[Westport, Connecticut|Westport]], [[Connecticut]] |isbn=0-313-31547-7 |pages=48-50}}

DumZiBoT (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Audio Lessonover? and Touch

I feel that Audio Lessonover? and Touch should be listed alongside each other in the discography section. Whilst they should certainly have their own pages, each line of the discography refers to a new project. For example, The Mission Bell is an entirely different project to Kingdom Of Comfort. However, Audio Lessonover and Touch are not, they're merely different versions of the same album. Usually, in this case, they wouldn't even have seperate wikipedia pages. The only reason they do, is because Touch gained a UK release with a UK release code (FURYCD7 I believe?) and because Audio Lessonover? never gained release in America. I think listing them alongside each other is important, as it would otherwise imply that Delirious? were releasing a new studio album every year between 1999 and 2003, when in actual fact 2002 was part of a hiatus for the band.

In the discography section of the band's most recent book - History Makers - the discography is listed as follows:

Cutting Edge
King Of Fools
Mezzamorphis
Audio Lessonover?/Touch
World Service
The Mission Bell
Kingdom Of Comfort

The absence of Glo is presumably a printing error - the point is that the band themselves consider the albums to be one discography entry.JALEXANDER06 (talk) 11:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

If you presume the absence of Glo is a printing error why do you not presume that placing Audio Lessonover? and Touch on the same line one as well? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Missing out Glo is obviously an error. Putting two near identitcal versions of an album side by side with a forward slash in between seems to me more likely to be intentional. In any case, the discography list serves as a table of contents for the book - each album has it's own section. Audio Lessonover? and Touch have been merged together on the same page, so it's clear that the band doesn't consider them to be two different projects. I think placing them alongside each other makes more sense than giving Touch a place on the discography as an entirely new project. The idea of the discography list is that it's a brief overview of the main projects by the band. This is why compilations and live albums aren't on there, and why I think that Touch should be moved alongside Audio Lessonover? JALEXANDER06 (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Added

I've just added Stews new(ish) site so edit away sheeple! Also, is there info about Dave Wood, or anyone else? should there be? I'm sorta new so tell me if i did anything wrong.Gymgirl101 (talk) 17:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Delirious?/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There's a lot still to be said about their various albums and stages in their musical development, as well as their major influence on the modern worship movement. This few complaints would normally make this B-class, but the amount of information about anything post-KoF is disturbingly low. It's still a very high Start-class, though. --3M163//Complete Geek 16:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Delirious?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090505080729/http://arts.wrecked.org/?filename=my-soul-sings-deliriouslyinterview-with-martin-smith-from-delirious to http://arts.wrecked.org/?filename=my-soul-sings-deliriouslyinterview-with-martin-smith-from-delirious
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.invadetheairwaves.org.uk/images/stories/Easter%20No.1%20-%20media%20release.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.invadetheairwaves.org.uk/images/stories/Delirious_Press_Release.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100328073223/http://www.invadetheairwaves.org.uk/ to http://www.invadetheairwaves.org.uk/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.christianpost.com/article/20040819/delirious-performs-145-146-world-service-146-146-at-olympics/print.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)