Talk:Dellingr/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and I should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A very nice article, in which I can find no problems, so I'm passing it to GA status. The only minor quibble I have is that you have one author's name spelled two different ways (Kerry vs Karry), which should probably be corrected. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 19:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Fixed! Thank you. :} :bloodofox: (talk) 03:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)