Talk:Delphi method

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Delphi method article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Futures studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is imported from Everything2; see their Dephi method page.

Some moved content

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Uclneaxel: Since I'm unsure how this highly detailed sentence which you contributed here fits into the broader context, I'm moving it here for possible comment:

The Delphi approach has been successfully employed to improve agreement between experts in iterative rating exercises on clinical test results using inter-rater kappa statistics as an outcome measure.^[1]

References

^ Petzold A, Biousse V, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Crum A, Digre K, et al. (16 July 2020). "Multirater Validation of Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures (PHOMS)". Neuro-Ophthalmology. 44 (6): 413–414. doi:10.1080/01658107.2020.1760891. PMC 7746256. PMID 33408429.

86.161.190.114 (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I agree. Uclneaxel (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is a notable absence under the variations subheading. It is commonly used in medical and clinical research settings with expert panels of specialist physicians.

https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/10/generating-evidence-using-the-delphi-method.html

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2011/MR1269.pdf Instantwatym (talk) 03:01, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Petzold A, Biousse V, Bursztyn L, Costello F, Crum A, Digre K, et al. (16 July 2020). "Multirater Validation of Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures (PHOMS)". Neuro-Ophthalmology. 44 (6): 413–414. doi:10.1080/01658107.2020.1760891. PMC 7746256. PMID 33408429.

[1]