Talk:Demons & Wizards (band)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Xiamatt in topic Question about a possible change to the page

Untitled

edit

I commented out the last bit because it seemed irrelevant, definitely to the page about the band, and maybe even to the album page. -leigh

I changed the typo that said that their frist album was in 2005 to agree with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demons_and_Wizards_%28album%29 -anonymous dude

Influences... part

edit

"Influences in these albums vary a lot but they are worth the listen as Hansi's voice works very well with Jon's guitar and the pair make for a very interesting side-project."

This is not neutral. It should be removed. Anzuhan 17:21, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hansis wife

edit

i replaced this because it was actually jon scaffers wife who suggested this. :)

sophomore album

edit

I don't think 'Touched by the crimson king' was less then 'Demons & Wizards'. It took a while to create, but I believe that Tbtck was received just as well or even better as 'Demons & Wizards'. 80.200.81.36 12:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Uriah Heep reference

edit

I don't agree with the line "Hansi always corrected her that it is more properly stated "Demons and Wizards", in reference to Uriah Heep's album of the same name" being in here..... I can not find any evidence from the sources listed to support this. 24.210.216.24

Supergroup

edit

Would this band be considered as a super group? I think so because there's the guitarist from Iced Earth and the vocalist from blind guardian. Sheish

Not really, a supergroup is composed of the 'star musician' from other bands. While two of them could be considered the 'star' the others I doubt would be. Mavrick (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Flag Icon

edit

I've removed the flag icons from this page per Manual of Style guidelines (specifically, emphasizing nationality in a band that doesn't represent any nation and using too many flags) as well as the clear rule on Template:Infobox Musical artist that flag icons are not necessary. Managerpants has pointed out in his edit summary that there was "no consensus for removal" on the Wikipedia:MOSFLAG Talk page, but official Manual of Style and template guidelines trump any discussions on Talk pages, especially when those discussions were meant to change the official policy. (People can argue as much as they want on a Talk page, but it's only a proposal until the official guidelines get changed.) That's how I see it, at least, and I think that guidelines back me up. Wyatt Riot (talk) 12:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • The manual of style does not refer to bands, only to individuals. Believe me, we have covered this in depth on the talk page over there. It's not a proposal to change the official guidelines, it's that the official guidelines DON'T cover this. Hope that makes sense! --Managerpants (talk) 18:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't see how a Manual of Style guideline like this can only apply to certain types of articles, but I'll take your word on it. The standards for the the artist template itself, however, states that we shouldn't be using flagicon. That applies to both individuals and groups. Wyatt Riot (talk) 23:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Demons and Wizards (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Question about a possible change to the page

edit

I would like to know whether Jon Schaffer should be considered a former member at this point? — Preceding unsigned comment added by James12183 (talkcontribs) 21:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Obviously not as long as there isn't official news about him leaving the project/being fired or whatever. Xiamatt (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply