Talk:Dena Grayson
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
editComments directly below in the Contested deletion section have been merged here from Draft:Dena Minning. North America1000 12:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... I'm still in the process of writing it. I would like some more time to write it, as I am learning the citation rules as I go. The person in the article is possibly going to be running for a Congress seat and also has been part of teams working on a cure for Ebola. Both of which I personally think are notable, especially if the first also comes true. --Fayrfayr (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- I support speedy deletion of this article because she has not yet done something that would qualify her for an article. Thousands of people write scientific articles and thousands of people have considered running for Congress. Should Ms. Minning decide to run for Congress and her candidacy is significant enough that the media reports on it with some regularity, then there may be a strong argument that she deserves an article. Until then, this page should be deleted. --Vrivasfl (talk) 16:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- I will move the contents to my sandbox and then see if there are more media reports. Fayrfayr (talk) 16:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Strange revert
editThis edit reverted the addition of material sourced to newspaper articles, the content of which can be easily verified by reading the articles. However, "inaccuraries" were claimed. Before deleting the material again, explain why these newspaper sources are supposedly "inaccurate". Hekerui (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dena Grayson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305231301/http://agln.aspeninstitute.org/fellows/dena-minning to http://agln.aspeninstitute.org/fellows/dena-minning
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)