Talk:Denise Levertov

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I think the article should discuss the nature and style of her poetry. Also, biographically, her movement toward and eventual conversion to Christianity should be treated, especially as it affected her poetry.

-Ethan

What Were They Like - date?

edit

Could someone please put at date on "What Were They Like"? - thanks Aferwe45 18:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Only Once

edit

All which, because it was

flame and song and granted us

joy, we thought we'd do, be, revisits

turns out to have been what it was

that 'once' only; every initiation

did not begin

a series, a build-up: the marvelous

did happen in our lives, our stories

are not drab with it's absence: but don't

expect now to return for more. Whatever more

there will be will be

unique as those were unique. Try

to acknowledge the next

song in its body-halo of flame as utterly

present, as now or never.

"Only Once"

by Denise Levertov

Note: poem was part of Rhonda Miles "Somewhere Between" entry at the Del Mar Fair / Fine Arts / 2nd place | 6/30/2011 HollySQ (talk) 07:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)User talk:HollySQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by HollySQ (talkcontribs) 07:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC) User talk:HollySQReply

Did you have a question or a comment about this? Span (talk) 12:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Misleading Bibliography

edit

The Denise Levertov bibliography under the "Collections" heading is misleading: some items in the list are individual poems, or groups of poems on a specific topic, which may have been published by themselves, or serially, in periodicals, but are not "Collections". These are not "Collections":

The Sharks (1952);

Life At War (1968);

At the Justice Department, November 15, 1969;

What Were They Like? (1971);

Wedding-Ring (1978);

The May Mornings (1982);

Living (1986).

The heading "Collections" is also itself misleading: the volumes published during her lifetime, which she assembled, should have the heading Primary Works. Some of the items in the list are in fact "Collections" -- some of her poems, edited together, usually by theme, by parties other than Levertov. Those should properly be listed as separate category Collections, and noted as to editors. In that category would be, as example, Selected Poems. (The edition listed was published by Bloodaxe in Britain in, apparently, 1986; there is a later "Selected Poems," published by New Directions, Edited by Paul Lacey. The complete citation of the latter example would include, at the least, "Edited by Paul Lacey, with a Preface by Robert Creeley", and linked to the "Robert Creeley" page.)

In addition, Levertov edited more volumes of poems written by others than indicated, and or wrote "Introductions" for such. Those would be listed under Collections -- or perhaps separate category Editor -- identifying author and or editor, and the standard "with Introduction by . . . ." etc., when that applies.

Last but not least, Levertov also translated poems by others (Octavio Paz and Alain Bousquet as examples), in some instances her translations being in collections with translations by others. As a translation is considered a creation of the translater, those should be listed under separate category Translations, with original author's name, and the standard "with Introduction by . . . ." etc., when that applies.

-JNagarya

Opening Bio lines: by virtue of ethnicity?

edit

there is something wrong in the story of her father. During WW1, just as during WW2, Russia sided with Britain, so having Russian heritage hardly got you arrested, unlike being a German national. If "ethnicity" is the term seriously meant, then it means that Brits arrested Jews thinking on the Government level that the latter were their actual enemy in WW1, which is something that would require serious sources. Tar-ba-gan (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denise Levertov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)Reply