Talk:Denmark–Eritrea relations

Denmark–Eritrea relations was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 8, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 6, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Denmark–Eritrea relations are conducted via their embassies in Kenya and Sweden after Denmark closed their embassy in Eritrea less than five years after it opened?

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Eritrea High‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Eritrea portal This article is supported by WikiProject Eritrea.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Denmark–Eritrea relations/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lead does not comply with WP:LEAD. The whole article should be summarised here.

Prose is stilted, poorly cast and contains elementary mistakes of grammar and spelling.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Appear to be reliable sources, assume good faith for Danish sources, could do with better consistency in publisher deatils, and langauge details (if not English).
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It seems rather thin, fails the broadness of coverage criterion, if there isn't more then it can't really be a good article.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Appears one-sided - all about Denmark's position, little from the Eritrean pov.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One licensed and tagged image form commons used
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
A fairly clearcut fail. there probably isn't enough matwerial to make this a good article ever. The prose is poor, the lead is inadequate, the article focusses exclusively on Denmark's part in the relationship, there is nothing about Eritrea's part. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denmark–Eritrea relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006113453/http://politiken.dk/udland/ECE40296/danske-mineryddere-paa-vej-hjem-fra-eritrea/ to http://politiken.dk/udland/ECE40296/danske-mineryddere-paa-vej-hjem-fra-eritrea/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic