Talk:Dennis Richardson (politician)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Another Believer in topic Source


Citations needed

edit

This article looks like Richardson (or his staff or supporters) have learned how to create a page on Wikipedia, but it also looks like they want to use Wikipedia as a campaign advertisement for the candidate. I removed a few of the glaringly-POV and uncited bits, but the article could certainly use more citations and less puffery. BlackberryLaw (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why is the only reference to Rep. Richardsons comments on Sandy Hook that of "Gawker"? Who died and left them the sole judge of "appropriateness"?? I seriously doubt, as the writer above tries to suggest, that this was posted by Rep. Richardson's staff. I'm sure there are many opposing views that could be cited. What, too busy, too lazy to find them?? Judging by just three recent events in Colorado, Utah and Oregon (mass killers stopped by concealed weapon carriers) his comments make perfect logical sense. Where is the balance here? There is a serious challenge of Wikipedia's, and the above writer's credibility here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.221.250.10 (talk) 16:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Occupation

edit

Reverted from "Ambulance Chaser" to "Attorney". WP's POV rules cover the revert, as "Ambulance Chaser" is an opinion. Keep this page neutral, please. 211.60.66.11 (talk) 19:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit