This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This page does not contain much information past what is already on the List of characters from Grey's Anatomy page. Also, since this character is dead, and will most likely not be seen again or will only be seen rarely, maintaining it as a separate page seems superfluous. Forteblast20:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I know that the characters will probably never be on the show again, but a think is fair, he to have his own article. Denny, we liked it or not is very important for Grey's Anatomy and we all know that. The guys who edit about One Tree Hill have made articles about characters that appears only for a season or two, and I mean who doesn't know about Denny, everybody knows that he is the guy that, that blonde girl fall in love and he died. And everybody knows that he is "that guy" who "nobody knows how" get back from the heaven because of a possible brain tumor of his lover, Izzie. I know that this sounds stupid but you have to admit it!? He appeared for enough and I think that he should have his own article. The article isn't good, and I know that, but soon we'll start with Grey's Anatomy WikiProject, to whom I invite you to join and we are going to discuss there about lot of stuff. Thankyou! ---Max(talk)14:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply