This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Headings
editThis page needs headings. Hyacinth 19:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Too much?
editThis page, with its wealth of analytical detail, strikes me as inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. Better to compress the description, link to the various analytical discussions, or cite them as references. Anyone agree?Cenedi 12:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's kind of cool to have a music article with this level and quality of content, more than the traditional track listing and album cover. :-) I think it could be pruned a bit, not sure you can get down by more than 1/3 without mangling the sense. Stan 02:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think it's too much at all. If the article was completed with other information the analysis would be one section of a full article and not seem so imposing. I think quality is good. Hyacinth (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Also, the article would benefit greatly from headings breaking it into sections. That way it wouldn't be a plain block of imposing text. Hyacinth (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think more could be done with paraphrase and reference/citation rather than direct quotation (particularly of Perle), but I think the content is itself quite good. /Ninly (talk) 04:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Error in Graphics
editThe image listing the appearances of the X motives has incorrect measure numbers; the second statement begins on bar 15, not 13. MMantini (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)