Talk:Department of Public Works and Highways

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move

Fair use rationale for Image:DPWH Seal.png

edit
 

Image:DPWH Seal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Department of Public Works and Highways (Philippines)Department of Public Works and Highways — Just suggesting. But there is only two articles that has Department of Public Works and Highways. The Department of Public Works and Highways (Philippines) one and the Department of Public Works and Highways (New Brunswick) one. I will do something on those two articles that has the same name like this one. User:3oWh pF0wHz 07:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.