| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deperming redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
This is just a basic description of the procedure, but if anyone has a more technical, detailed explanation of the process, please feel free to replace it with a better one! MikeyChalupa 17:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't understand the bit about a field more suitable for certain parts of the world. What exactly would make a magnetic signature "suitable" for anything? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.165.236 (talk) 10:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
How long between deperms? Anyone knows? 93.172.88.114 (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Degaussing
editWhy is this a separate article from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degaussing? --24.47.169.50 (talk) 06:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Split and Merge?
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It has been suggested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships that this article and Degaussing be reviewed for a possible split and/or merge. - theWOLFchild 01:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Merge They're the same thing. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, I agree. The only reason I mentioned 'splitting' was if we wanted to separate the degaussing of ships from the degaussing of electronics, such as computer monitors. - theWOLFchild 22:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- That makes sense too, but it's a job for disambiguation such as degaussing (ships) and degaussing (CRT). "Degaussing" has clear primacy over deperming, even in the US Navy. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Works for me. - theWOLFchild 22:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- That makes sense too, but it's a job for disambiguation such as degaussing (ships) and degaussing (CRT). "Degaussing" has clear primacy over deperming, even in the US Navy. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, I agree. The only reason I mentioned 'splitting' was if we wanted to separate the degaussing of ships from the degaussing of electronics, such as computer monitors. - theWOLFchild 22:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)