Talk:Dersim Rebellion

Upper case

It should be upper case. I moved it. See Boxer Rebellion, etc. Kavas (talk) 15:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

The content of the Dersim Revellion is not true. Any nation know that it was an genocid and not an rebellion. Even the turkish prime minister Erdogan is apologizing for the genocid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.6.1.80 (talk) 11:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Merge

I oppose to the merge. Two articles can be written. For example, Armenian_resistance_(1914–1918) and Armenian Genocide are two seperate articles on a very similar topic; this can also be applied to here. Kavas (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Source #32

I have talked about the mentioned "source!" before and I will talk about it here again. Nobody in their right minds -except for some sick, twisted African dictators- put people in barns and set them on fire in the 20th century. Turkey wasn't a strong political power back then, do you really believe that the world would look the other way on the issue. I dont think so! Civilians were killed, 13000, 40000, 70000... The numbers differ but what you call civilians, they attack the police, military officers, harm public property and then you say they are civilians, people who shoot at the government. If you want proof of vandalism by civilians, Early nowruz and the daily cost was 1 million liras Wall Street Journal Videoso i urge wikipedia to acknowledge these facts as well. Civilians, no. Kurdish resistance in Turkey are a bunch of Communist anarchists backed by Israel and Germany to cause unrest in the region so they can rule over the territory. How do you think PKK gets all those new weapons. (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.72 (talk)

Kurdish rebellion ?

Hi, we'd better not to determine this rebellion as Kurdish rebellion. "Kurdish rebellion" is nothing but the claim by Kurdish nationalist. Leezenberg refers to discussions about the Dersim rebellion in 1937 1938, which had long been claimed by Kurdish nationalists to be a Kurdish rebellion against the Kemalist State. Although this incident is a part of history of Zaza people, I think that this rebellion cannot be called as Zaza rebellion. Because "Zaza rebellion" is nothing but the claim by Zaza nationalist. We'd better determine this rebellion as Alevi rebellion. Moreover, I personally think this was not a rebellion. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 03:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Don't pollute here with turkish propagands please, will you change all the world minds? Turkey says there was no armenian genocide, did you accept that? Dersim rebellion genocide and massacre was in Kurdistan! http://www.hist.net/kieser/pu/Kocgiri.htmlHans-Lukas Kieser Occasional Paper n° 18, MERA (Middle East Research Associates), Amsterdam, juillet 1993. --Alsace38 (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

well, what can i say more, i did contribute to this article, if you want what i brought, just have a look, but pls, stop making propagand for turkish official point of vue! --Alsace38 (talk) 10:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I cannot think that Leezenberg made propaganda. Takabeg (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Please try to unpolitical, hust wanna to say that the time of "zaza is not kurd" is ended, just have a look to the new printed scolar book of turkish government, you will be shock, you are a little bit, in the pas now! According to turkish offical state now zaza are kurds, zazaki is kurdish, and look at student book! http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/kitaplar/kurdi_5_zazaki.pdf --Alsace38 (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

This article is not about language issue (I don't understand the intention of Ministry of Education of the Republic of Turkey. The text book includes İstiklâl Marşı, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk etc.). Unfortunately, I think your approach is Kurdish nationalists' one and you abuse WP:NPOV. As long as I know, Kurdish nationalists claims this rebellion should be Kurdish rebellion. Zaza nationalists claims this rebellion should be Zaza rebellion. However, this rebellion wasn't caused by neither Kurdish nationalism, nor Zaza nationalism (it started since 1980s). Rebels were Dersim Alevi tribes. So I believe that we must not emphasize Kurdish rebellion and Zaza rebellion. Do you understand ? Takabeg (talk) 02:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Well, i cannot say that i'll follow your minds, but instantly, saying that zazaki is not kurdish is absolutly unconstructf. On the students books of "education ministry" there are ataturk or turkish national hymn: it's normal 'cause every turkish students books got it! This book is made to end confusing speeches on something that peoples didn't know anything.

You cannot also tell i'am nationalis or what else, it's a non-sence. Zaza are one of major element of being as kurdish nation: look at "annals of human genetics"[[1]]. This repport was made under the control of U.N.O, 'cause turkey asked to create a new people "zaza". After huge DNa investigations in the rapport Zaza are considered nothing more than kurds! --Alsace38 (talk) 11:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Alsace38 Is this real? According to genetics we're all brothers. Genetics can't say more of it. Ethnicities consists of culture and especially language. They have a language. They are a diffrent culture. Stop nationalizing it. --Kafkasmurat (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Well what can I add more then? I cannot waste my time to disagree with ignorants, and peoples who do not know what science is...

lol Alsace38 (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)