Talk:Design management/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Wiki4des in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 02:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC) Please fix disamb links: Brunton and Farr. No bad links.Reply

fixed Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

What is the relationship between this article and Design management in organization? Should the article be listed in a hatnote or a See Also section?

proposed Design management in organization for deletion Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
article Design management in organization deleted on January 23rd Wiki4des (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Prose is far from clear. Article should be rewritten completely.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    proposed new article structure: User:Wiki4des Wiki4des (talk) 14:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Delete "has become a relevant discipline around the world during the last decade. It" in first sentence.
    deleted Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    "from the discovery phase (fuzzy front-end)" - unacceptable parenthetical. How can you equate the two terms?
    deleted Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    "phrased the term" -> "coined the term" or "invented the term"
    done Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    In footnotes, spell out "Design Management Institute" as the publisher instead of abbreviating DMI.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Inappropriate use of lists and tables.
    changed Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Section and subsection headings have inappropriately capitalized words - "Design management in Companies" and "Design Management Hierarchy"
    done Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Source for quote is http://www.dmi.org/dmi/html/aboutdmi/design_management.htm
    done Wiki4des (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Fn 2 -only has month and year of retrieval. Should give full date of retrievals.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 00:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Fn 20 - naked url. Use {{cite web}}
    done Wiki4des (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Add publisher to all cites
    done Wiki4des (talk) 00:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Fn 25 and 26 uses pp which means a range of pages, but only page 32 or 58 was given. Were all of these multiple references all really on the same page?
    done Wiki4des (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Volume parameter should be just the volume number, not volume number a comma and the year.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Need secondary sources independent of the design management movement and organizations such as Design Management Institute.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 14:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Block quotes should be integrated into the prose.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    "applied in the company correlates" should be " applied in a company correlates" avoid improper use of the definite article.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Lead paragraph needs to summarize the article.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    " The Design Leadership Fellowship by the University of Oxford is founded." should be " The Design Leadership Fellowship at the University of Oxford is founded."
    done Wiki4des (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    enlarged coverage Wiki4des (talk) 14:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Article presupposes the value of design management over other approaches.
    done Wiki4des (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    File:Dm-definition.pdf probably needs an email to OTRS to document who owns the copyright and who is licensing it. Organization vs. individual?
    OTRS pending Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    OTRC permission received (Ticket#2011011610006807) Wiki4des (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    File:Max Liebermann Porträt Peter Behrens.jpg - Max died on February 8, 1935, so the copyright expired in 2005 in some countries, 2035 in others.
    changed image to one without copyright issues Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    The caption for tactical design management photo is too long and wordy.
    shortened Wiki4des (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I am sorry, but this article needs to be completely rewritten and does not meet the criteria. Racepacket (talk) 04:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    thanks, all changes have been made, completing article in next step (see to-do list) for second GA application Wiki4des (talk) 00:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply