Talk:Desmostylia

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Genera

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

While the taxonomic box and the main text agree that there are six genera, they don't agree as to what the genera are! The taxo box says 'Vanderhoofius', whereas the main article has 'Kronokotherium'; are these synonyms or truly considered as separate genera?Glevum (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I forgot that I redirected Vanderhoofius to Desmostylus. I amended the taxobox accordingly.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic