Talk:Detachable Penis

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

post-undelete

edit

The article was tagged and deleted for the following: notability, original research, unencyclopedic, unreferenced. At my request, it was undeleted.

To address these issues:

  • notability: it has 11 mentions in wikipedia, 21k google hits with correct band name, 182k google hits just on the title, and is repeatedly mentioned in the all music guide writeup of the band. That sounds notable to me.
  • original research: I'm not sure which parts that's an issue with.
  • unencyclopedic: I have to admit a slight bias since I contributed to the article, but I didn't do the first two sections, which strike me as well written, encylopedic in tone, relevant, and accurate description of a topic that seems notable.
  • references: definitely the key problem. I've added a refs section that points to the "all music guide" entries for the band and for the album, which support the initial paragraph; the song is mentioned repeatedly in that description. I also added links for the lyrics and the video, as well as a link to the cv of the video's director. So hopefully we're ok on this...

I've pulled the problem tags from the article.

Are there any deletion issues/problems outstanding? -- Akb4 (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability noted

edit

[i can remember this song from the last millennium, over 20 years ago, from uni radio] it is sooo notable that even its notability; and even, even this talk page is notable[1] [although i will have graunched the ref when this goes up] David Woodward ☮ ♡♢☞☽ 05:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Congrats, Akb4! CapnZapp (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ John, Timmer (Jan 16, 2016). "On Wikipedia's 15th birthday, Ars shares the entries that most fascinate us". ars technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved 16 January 2016. Fight the good fight, Akb4!
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Detachable Penis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply