Talk:Detroit bankruptcy

Reversion of reverts

I have reverted three edits which were reversions themselves, so that we can discuss and agree on whether the original edits should stay on this article. Thanks for voicing an opinion. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

You are practicing WP:OWN if you revert every reversion to this page. None of the three are controversial and one was discussed[1] which you're conveniently forgetting since you took part in it too. The judge doesn't have an article and the Government of Detroit category is for agencies of the government. Just look at what is listed there....William 14:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

You are mistaken User:WilliamJE. I like to encourage others to contribute to this article. Contributions such as the ones added by User: Pechmerle (and others) is what changed this article from its very humble beginnings to the source of information it is today drawing over 20,000 reader views to wikipedia every month. Can you match that?

If you have concerns about the fact that I added back information which you removed, lets discuss it here instead of edit-warring OK? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your statement 'Can you match that' is a clear sign of your practicing WP:OWN. You think you're entitled to decide how this article is edited because of work you did to this article. Clearly disregarding what Wikipedia's Manual of Style says a great deal too, as does your reversions of yesterday. WP:ELRCmakes it clear that the link you put back in the article doesn't belong.

If you want me to bring this to ANI, I will....William 15:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

New information that need to be added

• http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303465004579325222553286380
• http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/governor-plans-aid-detroit-pensions-save-art-21625266
• http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2014/01/22/states-350-million-offer-to-help-end-detroit-bankruptcy-is-not-a-bailout-says-governor/
• http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/01/tim_skubick_with_detroit_bankr.html
• http://www.thestate.com/2014/01/21/3219431/detroit-manager-feb-bankruptcy.html
• http://www.thestate.com/2014/01/21/3219431/detroit-manager-feb-bankruptcy.html
• http://www.livingstondaily.com/article/20140122/NEWS01/140122007/Snyder-State-would-pledge-350-million-Detroit-bankruptcy

XOttawahitech (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Detroit bankruptcy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130809140012/http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130221/METRO01/302210375 to http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130221/METRO01/302210375

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Detroit bankruptcy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.expressnightout.com/printedition/PDF/EXPRESS_07192013.pdf?issuusl=ignore
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140522211200/http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140522/POLITICS02/305220076 to http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140522/POLITICS02/305220076

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Belle Isle cannot be sold?

The caption for the image of Belle Isle says "View of Downtown Detroit from Belle Isle Park, one of Detroit's several assets that cannot be sold" but immediately in the section it is pictured, it says that Belle Isle can be sold ("other city assets that could be sold include the Coleman A. Young International Airport[34] and the Belle Isle Park") Cdiesh (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)