Talk:Devon County War Memorial/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Nmateo1997 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is it customary to use capital letters for "War Crosses"?

Generally no, but in this case "War Cross" is Lutyens' name for the design of his 15 cross-shaped war memorials so I've treated it as a proper noun (the sources do likewise). I'll get round to turning into a blue link at some point. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

I shortened some of the longer sentences but I can't find much fault with this at all, good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Perfectly satisfactory for GA. Hope to see more at GAN!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good Afternoon! I just read your article and wanted to give you some feedback! I think the article was very informative. Your resources were reliable which helped me feel comfortable with the info and your credibility. I wouldve loved a translation to the Latin inscription on the memorial. In summary, I think you did a great job posting and presenting the info in a professional and unbiased manner! Nmateo1997 (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.