Talk:Dhaka Shishu Hospital

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Directordsh (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Dralijacobarsalan (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Copyright problem removed

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://dhakashishuhospital.org/dsh/DSH_Overview.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 13:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removed stale COI tag with no active discussion per Template:COI

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An old neutrality-related tag that appears to have no active discussion has been removed from this article per the instructions at Template:COI. The template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever any one of the following is true:

There is consensus on the talk page that the issue has been resolved
The problem is not explained on the article's talk page, and the specific problem is unclear
In the absence of any discussion, or if discussion about resolving the problem has become dormant

The article has been slashed by three-quarters in the four years since it was tagged. No obvious overarching neutral point of view or other content policy violation remains. There is no evidence of ongoing discussion of conflict of interest, so I've removed the tag for now and replaced it with connected contributor here. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, please feel free to restore the COI template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! Worldbruce (talk) 23:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic