Talk:DiDa Ritz/GA2

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Averageuntitleduser in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 15:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 12:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

One can never review to many drag queen GANs, excited to work with you again! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 12:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ditto! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Well-written

edit

Did a bit of copy-editing, and here's what I'm left with:

  • She also joined thousands for the Drag March for Change — for clarity, perhaps: "She also joined the thousands participating in the Drag March for Change"
  • Link "The Princess"
  • high points of the season — perhaps: "her high points within the season", to relate this more directly to her
  • She is a member of the House of Hall — in this sentence, perhaps more emphasis on the House of Hall being an in-show lineage? Because someone might perceive it along the lines of a charitable organization.

Verifiable with no original research

edit

Essentially all sources are reliable. As a student publication, The Columbia Chronicle and Indiana Daily Student are fine for events in their community (their uses are also uncontroversial), the Yahoo! Life article isn't syndicated, and Pride.com and Screen Rant, which are mildly reliable, are primarily used for attributed opinion. No issues with close paraphrasing during my spot-check. The Screen Rant quote brings the Earwig score to 43% (27% in second place), but I believe its use is justified, it would be hard to express their sheer positivity another way. For the record, I paraphrased one part of The Columbia Chronicle quote.

Spot-check

edit
  • Greenfield, Beth (2020-05-15). "How out-of-work drag performers are lifting fans up through online pandemic shows: 'A time to be creative'". Yahoo! Life. Archived from the original on 2023-03-30. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Looks good  Y
  • Huley, Rachel (2021-06-16). "Out at Night: Top 30 Names in Queer Nightlife". Out. ISSN 1062-7928. Archived from the original on 2023-06-09. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Looks good  Y
  • Stafford, Erin (2022-08-22). "Bloomington PRIDE to present drag performers DiDa Ritz, Saint at annual Pridefest Aug. 27". Indiana Daily Student. Indiana University Bloomington. Archived from the original on 2023-07-31. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Looks good  Y
  • Peikert, Mark (2012-03-27). "Recap: RuPaul's Drag Race Episode 9". Out. Archived from the original on 2023-06-09. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Bottom two is a reasonable assumption, looks good  Y
  • Brooks, Sam (2019-10-03). "A definitive ranking of all 162 Lip Syncs on RuPaul's Drag Race". The Spinoff. Archived from the original on 2023-05-25. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Looks good  Y
  • Ermac, Raffy (2022-03-01). "The 7 Best 'Drag Race' Performances Ever, According to Michelle Visage". Out. Archived from the original on 2023-06-01. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Looks good  Y
  • "On Point With: DiDa Ritz". Thotyssey. 2020-08-27. Archived from the original on 2023-06-02. Retrieved 2023-12-14.
    • Looks good  Y

Broad in its coverage

edit

I've done a whole lot of looking for sources. Ritz seems on the more popular end of drag queens, considering how many mentions she has received over the years about her lip-sync. But, I think the article does a great job of balancing this with the other aspects of her time on Drag Race, and her other activities in general; there are some really great finds. The most detailed unused sources are drama ones, which... yeah no.

Neutral

edit

Neutral as can be.

Stable

edit

No recent content disputes or edit wars.

Illustrated

edit

The two Flickr images are informative and correctly labeled as Creative Commons.

Summary

edit

I don't think I'll ever stop being enamored by these; great work and happy Easter! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Averageuntitleduser Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I like the fixes; I am now happy to promote this article! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.