 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editIf the article has been assessed as within the scope of the above three projects, it seems perverse to delete it. Certainly as stub class it needs improvement and expansion, but that's another matter. Also there are some people of such historic and world stature, like Sir Winston Churchill (or Nelson Mandela,say, or FD Roosevelt, or Stalin et al) that being their child is sufficient justification for inclusion in this or any other encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.31.137 (talk) 08:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Surname
editThe article claims that [o]n 11 April 1962, her name was legally changed back to Diana Churchill. How could it have been "changed back" to Churchill when her maiden name was Spencer-Churchill? Either her name was changed to Churchill or it was changed back to Spencer-Churchill. Vernoeming (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a family genealogy blog
editCan I get consensus to remove the grandchildren and great-grandchildren? Diana's children are borderline notable but I see no reason to list the later generations, in most cases born after Diana's death.
I removed those details in March and a single-purpose user Wikifoo22 recently reverted those edits. Looking for consensus to avoid an edit war. Wire723 (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-encyc
editShe attended... the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art, where she spent five terms, although her focus was not on acting.
- Not encyc. What does this mean? Valetude (talk) 08:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)