Talk:Dick Turpin/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Inital comments

Another WP:FAC in the offing? I'll give it a thorough check out first before awarding GA-status. :-) Pyrotec (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry for the delay in adding some proper comments. I was reviewing four out of ten educational assignment GANs; and nasty case, infectious, of "copyvios" errupted. This review is now top of my list for tomorrow. Pyrotec (talk) 22:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well-illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well-illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)