Talk:Dickie Rock

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Maproom in topic Controversy section

Anglo-Irish incident

edit

It is incredible that there is no mention of the link between the "Anglo-Irish incident" and Wikipedia, and that the Dickie Rock article continues to be mostly unsourced. The issue was this, "Anglo Irish Bank has begun an investigation after lewd additions made to the Wikipedia page of cabaret singer Dickie Rock were found to have originated from one of its computers." from http://www.tribune.ie/article/2009/may/10/lewd-edits-to-dickie-rock-wikipedia-page-made-at-a/ This underscores the importance of good monitoring. And a well sourced article would have helped prevent the incident. cckkab (talk) 10:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's on there now. Good monitoring yes, but well sourced would not have prevented the incident. Having said that some cleanup is needed.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dickie Rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Controversy section

edit

I propose deleting the Wikipedia controversy. It's trivial; and it tells us nothing about the subject. Ok, he gave a sensible response when asked about the incident, but so would most people. Maproom (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply