Talk:Did Six Million Really Die?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Antisemitic? Or not.
editThe disambiguation line has stated in the past "This article is about the 1974 antisemitic pamphlet...." Today it has been changed twice by IP-editor/s to "This article is about the 1974 pamphlet...." and subsequently reverted by two different editors (including myself). It seems clear to me that a "Holocaust denial" pamphlet is, ipso facto, by its very existence, anti-semitic. Apparently others disagree - let's discuss and come to a consensus. Shearonink (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's really the same IP editor and if I see it again I'm blocking the range. Anything the National Front publishes about Jews can be assumed to be antisemitic until reliable sources prove otherwise. Any editor trying to imply that a a work on Holocaust denial from the National Front is not antisemitic is not here to build a reality-based encyclopedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Antisemitic" gets the point across. "Historical-denialist" or "Holocaust-denialist" work but both are longer. No change is needed at this time. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Rudolf Vrba uttering "licentia poetarum" in a trial
edit"Attacked on all sides by Zündel’s lawyer, the impostor had no other recourse than to invoke, in Latin, the “licentia poetarum,” or “poetic license,” in other words, the right to engage in fiction." The Zündel Trials (1985 and 1988) (ihr.org) 76.115.40.93 (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)