Talk:Diego's Hair Salon
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diego's Hair Salon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Diego's Hair Salon was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 8, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the clientele of Diego's Hair Salon has included politicians, diplomats, and two U.S. Supreme Court Justices? | |||||||||
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deletion Talk
editLet's start a debate here of reasons to delete/keep this article. Just to clarify, I nominated the article for deletion. Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether the article is ultimately kept or deleted (if it is indeed nominated for deletion via AfD), I think a prod was inappropriate. A prod for notability makes no sense in an article with more than one independent source. LadyofShalott 01:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have removed the notability tag, the sources provided clearly display the subject's notability.--kelapstick (talk) 01:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
The appropriate deletion route now is via WP:AFD. Another possible discussion is Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. I think that the article would pass notability, so a deletion discussion would likely result in a Keep. A more possible discussion is a merger to Dupont Circle, Washington, D.C.. I think that might be an interesting discussion, and I couldn't predict the end result, though suspect it may end up as No merge. SilkTork *YES! 11:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
I agree that it would be an interesting merger debate, but I also think it would end up as No Merge. There is no category in the Dupont Circle article under which this article could fall under. This building is not a landmark, and has only limited community significance. Ryderofpelham123 (talk) 23:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)