Talk:Diet food

Untitled

I got rid of the link to Simplesse because if ONE obscure diet food product is listed under See Also, EVERY obscure diet food product has to be listed.

--PsychoCola 00:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kellyyyyy123.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

HARSH DIET

Harsh diet is not good for health

Importance rating and expansion request

I figure that since fat-reduced and sugar-reduced foods are very common and very sought after in many countries, this entry demands a "high" importance. It ought to be expanded especially with regard to the various processes that are used to reduce caloric value in various food (e.g., non-fat milk isn't merely a "milk with a non-fat substitution", which the article seems to imply). W n C? 16:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Second slightly different meaning.

There is another slightly different meaning of "diet food", to refer to foodstuffs that normally have nutritional properties making them common on diets (as opposed to diet variants of normally high energy/fat/sugar foods). Cottage cheese is a classic example. With a source, this would be worth adding to the article with some examples. 94.194.66.92 (talk) 11:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Inappropriate Advertising and Article Rating

I feel it's inappropriate to advertise a unique product in an encyclopedia article in general and about diet foods in specific, particularly since the product itself is addictive and this article has been rated as "High-importance" on the project's rating scale. The advertisement is seen in both the dialogue and the prominent placement of a photograph depicting more than one example of a very specific product. It seems to violate Wikipedia's general practice of singling one product to the exclusion of all others.

    The article needs further development. Although the topic itself is indeed highly important, the article as is lacks sufficient scope or depth to warrant the rating.Karenbauernschmidt (talk) 05:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

totally agree remove stupid cola picture!!! this is not a mag!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.231.146 (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

New Sort of Diet

At the moment I`m trying a new diet that is sopped to help with weigt reductions. I'm summarizing a couple of receipts that I'm using for weigt reduction and I#m kind of anxious because theey are new, and they are mainly consisting of vegetables. There are also som with bread and eggs, cheese, but all of them are difficult to get together. That's why I'm looking for a kind of space where you can put them all together.WaltedWest (talk) 13:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

zero calories?

Zero-calorie redirects here, but there are no mentions of "zero-calorie" drinks, like diet soda. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

xx% fat-free

I'm wondering about how under US regulations a product can claim to be 97% fat-free when it's 80% fat. I think that would be worth a section. Anyone know? — kwami (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diet food. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161005192448/https://www.thenutritionalsource.com/definitions-of-nutrient-content-claims/ to https://www.thenutritionalsource.com/definitions-of-nutrient-content-claims/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I edited process section because there was no indication of the benefits of eating low-fat foods. Also I added example of low-fat food part because some people don't know what an example of low-fat food is. KellyKellyyyyy123 (talk) 03:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)