Talk:Digital artifactual value
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Copyright problem removed
editOne or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub103/section3.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC) Binksternet (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Question and answer
editI deleted the question-and-answer styling of the article. Wikipedia is not a lesson book, it is an encyclopedia. It is also not prescriptive; it is not here to tell the reader what they should do or think. What we do is describe, not prescribe. We should tell the reader what the mainstream thinking is, with appropriately weighted mention of significant non-mainstream thinking, if any. Binksternet (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)