Talk:Digital hoarding

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 85.255.29.90 in topic This article needs major refocusing or rework

Untitled

edit

Original research on Wikipedia? Editor8778 (talk) 01:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ginnerz06. Peer reviewers: Ha1154, Hf1842, He3525.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removing copy-edit template

edit

I've reviewed and revised this article, and decided it's in good shape now to remove the copy-edit template. Mary Gaulke (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Porn

edit

is something no article of this scope can be complete without discussing. Just saying. ―cobaltcigs 00:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reddit

edit

A famous reddit is dedicated to this. https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.51.235 (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

That subreddit is not about a hoarding "disorder" (as described in the article here) but is mostly "normal" people who choose to archive material to stop it being lost. 2A00:23C5:FE56:6C01:B0EC:1E46:190C:DE32 (talk) 13:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Word Choice

edit

apparently my mind chose to completely ignore the words "acquisition and reluctance" and focused entirely on the "to delete electronic material no longer valuable to the user" part when I was reading the info panel on google and made me think 'wait... that doesn't seem right'. I guess that's just how our mind works right? we ignore the starting terms of a sentence and try to find the part that we're interested it. Maybe we can get rid of the words "acquisition and reluctance" as many non-english speakers might not be familiar with the terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clasiqh (talkcontribs) 17:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Gathering Sources

edit

After reviewing this article I chose it as the subject of a class assignment. I am currently gathering sources to rethink the presentation of this topic. So far my research indicates there is not enough evidence to support digital curation as a medical condition as the first possible correlation. The Criticism section of this article may contain more important aspects of digital hoarding as it is understood today. If anyone has ideas or sources they would recommend I include in my review, please share.

Bibliography In Progress

  • Bozacı, İ., & Gökdeniz, İ. (2020). Development of a digital photo hoarding scale: A research with undergraduate students. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 2193-2200. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.3.017
  • Eppingstall, J., Xenos, S., & Yap, K. (2020). Acceptance and commitment therapy for hoarding disorder: A proposed treatment protocol for individuals. Australian Psychologist, 55(3), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12438
  • Kos Koklic, M., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Vida, I. (2022). Consumers’ de-ownership as a predictor of dark-side digital acquisition behavior: Moderating role of moral intensity and collectivism. Journal of Business Research, 138, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.018
  • Neave, N., McKellar, K., Sillence, E., & Briggs, P. (2019). Digital hoarding behaviours: measurement and evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 96: 72–77, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.037
  • Perceived locus of control for clutter: Reported reasons for clutter in adults with and without hoarding symptoms. (2021). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12332
  • Sweeten, G., Sillence, E., & Neave, N. (2018). Digital hoarding behaviours: underlying motivations and potential negative consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 85: 54–60, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.031
  • van Bennekom, M. J., Blom, R. M., Vulink, N., & Denys, D. (2015). A case of digital hoarding. BMJ Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-210814
  • Vitale, F., Janzen, I., & McGrenere, J. (2018). Hoarding and minimalism: tendencies in digital data preservation. CHI 2018, April 21–26, Montreal Canada, doi: 10.1145/3173574.3174161
  • Weiss, E. R., Todman, M., & Roane, D. M. (2021). Assessing acquisition and discarding behavior using an online simulation task: A validation study. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2021.100683
  • Wessels, T. (2012). Getting off the data storage treadmill. New Hampshire Business Review, 34(25), 21

Editing Scope

edit

Have you all found issues with fixing the "neutrality" of this article? Because it is considered to be detrimental to people who have it, how would you guys go about editing to the article to fix that issue? I'm hoping to fix the neutrality dispute by using using more passive language, and adding more citations to add to the credibility of the article. I'm going to be working on this article as an assignment for my university course, and will probably be working on it for a couple more weeks. Feel free to comment on any edits I may make. CherryPanda12 (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Diagraphephobia"

edit

This word seems vanishingly rare, hardly used outside of the one linked article. I do not believe it deserves a mention here. 2A00:23C5:FE56:6C01:B0EC:1E46:190C:DE32 (talk) 13:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

In fact I'm removing it because it's a spam page with spammy links. 2A00:23C5:FE56:6C01:B0EC:1E46:190C:DE32 (talk) 13:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

This article needs major refocusing or rework

edit

Specifically, it seems to be almost exclusively about "data hoarding" as some (fringe) pathological psychological disorder or condition which is, in my opinion, not the common use. The far, far more common use is people who take digital archival into their own hands (see the datahoarding reddit) for some ideological reason, and I think the article should reflect this. "Digital hoarding" is not in the DSM, and this entire article could be compressed down and become a subtopic on the main article for hoarding disorder.

Meanwhile, there's a lot of interesting stuff that could be written about the "data hoarder" movement in the context of internet subculture, digital rights management, etc. 85.255.29.90 (talk) 09:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply