Talk:Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Fuhghettaboutit in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acidDihomo-γ-linolenic acid – In accordance to the IUPAC nomenclature the title need to be Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, but this name is in the title blacklist. Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 22:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

As far as I can tell, the MOS doesn't advise against it in situations like this, but rather just notes the need for appropriate redirects. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

ToDo:
  • Initial discovery, characterization, synthesis (who , when, where)
  • There's actually very little to say about this chemical apart from gamma-Linolenic acid. This will always be a short article.
  • Discussion of the elongation/saturation from GLA and on to Arachidonic acid
  • Space filling model would look nice.

Last edited at 03:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 13:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)