Talk:Dimagi

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dimagi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512162957/http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2011/sb20110621_158462.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2011/sb20110621_158462.htm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested Edit to Dimagi page

• What I think should be changed: Hi there! I submitted four edit changes on December 3 to the page Dimagi (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dimagi&action=history), all with the intent of updating the information on the page to more timely information. Per Wikipedia's updated Conflict of Interest Policy (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#How_to_disclose_a_COI), I am employee at Dimagi (although not one hired to write content) and have stated my COI on my user profile (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GJavetski).

I am writing to request if it would be possible for someone to review my four edits (prior to my final one where I reverted) with the username GJavetski on December 3, 2021 to see if it would be possible to edit the page. I have ensured that none of these are "selling" any products, all have external references, and all have the right attributions. Thank you.

• Why it should be changed: To update the page to more up to date information.

• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): All of the changes I made use the cite mechansim.

GJavetski (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey I'm taking a look at the differences now, Ill reply when I'm done Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey I finished looking at your revisions and I just have the one question about the removal of a few items under the partnerships tag. Otherwise, you can see on the edit request tag above you are able to make those changes yourself. Like I said below, Ill take a look at those two items in the morning if you haven't responded yet. TAG: Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

14:07 UTC Revision. I support the change.

14:09 UTC Revision. Accurate as per first page of source.

14:15 Revision. The infobox seems fine, I would ask what the removal under "partnerships" was for, I'll take a look in the morning with fresh eyes though and see what that is when I can read the sources.

15:06 Revision. It all seems good. I'm just gonna take your word on San Fancisco because I can't see it, but your source is still acceptable under WP:PAYWALL so don't worry about that because your other sources are good.

Forgot to tag you in my reply @GJavetski:

References