Talk:Dingyuan-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 04:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

• Section 1;
  • Naval conflicts with Western powers; could you get in some examples?
  • viceroy; I think "v" must be capital; and "viceroy" of what?
• Section 1.1; Consistency maintained, all the parameters—Displacement, Length, Beam, Draft, Power, Propulsion, Speed, Armament and armor—seem fine. Conversion templates and link s in right place
• Section 1.2;
  • 31.5-long-ton (32.0 t); be consistent, remove -
  • Link stern
  • barbettes; this is over linked
  • 3 inches (7.6 centimetres); abbreviate units
  • 8 inches (20 centimetres); abbreviate units
  • 3–0.5 inches (7.6–1.3 centimetres); abbreviate units
• Section 3;
  • Link Captain
  • pre-assigned; it is single word, remove -
  • and began to sink, She was quickly; replace , with .
• Remove section 6 as it is empty. Move the commons box to the last section.
• Make sure that all the units in the infobox are abbreviated.
• All good with dab and external links. 0% violation, good job.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing, I've made those changes as suggested with the exception of the commons link, which I switched from the box template to an inline link. Miyagawa (talk) 20:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)