Talk:Dinko Šakić
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dinko Šakić article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Refimprove tag
editI removed it. Whoever thinks that it shall be put back - please, justify it on this page.--Don Luca Brazzi (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Trial
editThe part of the text about Sakic's trial and eventual imprisonment (presumably for war crimes in WW2) is very confusing. It is never stated WHERE he was tried! Immediately before that section, there is a discussion of an interview in South America, leading to the Argentine president's plea for his immediate arrest. Then, there was a sentence about his potentially taking refuge in Croatian embassy.
Right after that, there is the section about the trial. WHERE was the trial held and how it came to the trial -- where was he arrested and by whom and what was the connection to the section immediately preceding?
After reading and rereading various sections in this Wikipedia article and appurtenant references, I came to the conclusion that the trial was held in Croatia, and that he was interred in a Croatian prison. But that is nowhere explicitly stated. How he came to be tried in Croatia is not clear. 64.185.146.110 (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)randomreader
Repeated section
editHi, expert editors... just wanted to point out that the part about how he came back into public light in Argentina first appears at the article beginning and then is repetead on the "Exile" section. This is not just the same content with different words... it's just the same text, copied and pasted; it's not clear where it belongs, but not in both sections at the same time. I'm not a wikipedian, not sure what to do about it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.41.224.126 (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)