Talk:Diplodocimorpha

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ornithopsis in topic Proposal of merge with Diplodocoidea

Proposal of merge with Diplodocoidea

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was unanimous agreement to merge. Ornithopsis (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Diplodocoidea and Diplodocimorpha have nearly identical content, usually differing only in the inclusion of Haplocanthosaurus and sometimes not even that. There is pretty much no value in having separate pages for the two clades, and keeping them separate would be somewhat redundant and waste editors' time with two pages to maintain rather than one. Diplodocoidea is both the more inclusive clade and gets eight times as many hits on Google Scholar, so Diplodocimorpha should be merged into Diplodocoidea. Ornithopsis (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think I support this, provided its not just redirected, and the content is migrated over. The main superfamily article needs some work. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 15:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.