Talk:DirectX Video Acceleration

DVXA

When I search wikipedia for DVXA, this article does not show up. Can someone make a redirect for that? I'm not too familiar with creating/editing wiki pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Selflove (talk • contribs) 03:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

As there doesn't seem to be any other logical target for the misspelling DVXA, I've done so Nil Einne (talk) 10:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

With all due respect to the open source community, mentioning Media player classic first is hijacking.

This is because it's a mere user of the Microsoft renderer. If you are going to put something first for that it should be microsoft's player. --195.74.255.240 (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect WDDM preqrequisite for DXVA2 statement?

I know Microsoft's own docs suggest this, but I have a Via VX700 which (according to DXVAChecker) does some EVR/MFT decodes even though it has XDDM drivers (though the drivers are explicitly targeted at Vista). 203.158.57.23 (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

DXVA for video conversion??

Everything here talks about video playing. However this program claims to use it to accelerate video conversion

http://www.freemake.com/news/freemake_speeds_up_video_conversion_with_dxva_technology

http://social-tech.findtechnologynews.com/directx-video-acceleration-boosts-freemake-video-converter-2-2-performance-by-50/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmaldia (talk • contribs) 23:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Well I don't know if DVXA is used, but I know the GPU itself can be used. Things like Sony Vegas use the OpenCL library for using the GPU to accelerate the video rendering, making the total render time up to 10x faster. moeburn (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

"Video cards that should be fast enough are..."

"GPUs that should be fast enough are: AMD: Radeon HD 6xxx and newer"

I'd just like to point out that AMD actually explicitly says the minimum AMD card for copy-back GPU accelerated DVXA rendering. It's my card, the Radeon HD 5770. And it is definitely fast enough. I'll find the source, but in the mean time, it isn't "should be fast enough", its "AMD explicitly says that this is the lowest card that is fast enough". moeburn (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

This whole section is spurious. Fast enough for what? 640x480? 4K? What frame rate?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DirectX Video Acceleration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704122528/http://corecodec.com/products/coreavc/changelog to http://corecodec.com/products/coreavc/changelog

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)