Talk:Directly elected mayors in England

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ham II in topic Title

Title

edit

All mayors are elected, one-way or another - most by councillors. Surely the title should be Directly-elected mayors in the United Kingdom?? AndrewRT 00:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Institute for Public Policy report suggested that Gtr Manchester and Gtr Birmingham should have strategic elected Mayors (on the GLA model) rather than Manc/Brum Cities should be forced to adopt one of the Mayor LA model Philcrbk 23:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Better yet, "Directly elected mayors in England" - no hyphen, no need to bring in the other three countries of the UK (at least in the title - the section explaining that they have no directly elected mayors is informative and worth keeping). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.242.160 (talk) 21:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The legislation though covers England and Wales - although there's so far been only one referendum in Wales which was unsuccessful, the basics of the model, the creation and the election process are all equally applicable. Timrollpickering (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'd prefer Directly elected mayors in England, as the current title implies to me "directly elected mayors which are (or have been) in England and Wales" more strongly than it does "the principle of having directly elected mayors in England and Wales (although there haven't yet been any in Wales)". By contrast, the title England and Wales mayoral referendums is perfectly accurate. Ham II (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

'yes', we don't want a mayour

edit

In the section 'Referendum in Existing Mayoral authority' the table is a little confusing - one might imagine a 'yes' vote either indicated that a mayor should be abolished, or that the status quo should be maintained. I've tried to think of a pithy, unambiguous way to describe the situation - maybe 'keep' and 'abolish'? --Neil (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

ElectMayor

edit

I don't think I'm being unfair in observing that the current problems this page is experiencing are overwhelmingly as a result of ElectMayor (talk). Also looking at his/her contributions (s)he seems like an interested party who can't observe NPOV rules. There are obvious problems with the writing style, grammar and use of weblinks too but ElectMayor now seems to be quite persistent in reverting changes made to his/her edits (even when the original changes still contain parts of his/her contributions). Anyone else? Pjbeef (talk) 23:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Abolition campaigns

edit

This paragraph implies such campaigns are current, but the dates given for Doncaster and Lewisham are over four years ago, whilst the Torbay case seems more a case of councillors opposing the system than a grassroots driven move. Just how current are these campaigns? Anyone can set up a website or petition for abolition and have it ongoing but that's not really notable in and of itself. Timrollpickering (talk) 11:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mayor of Newham (Elected Mayor) - Olympic Borough

edit

For anyone thinking about elected mayors, I want to say they reduced democracy. In the London Borough of Newham. Under an elected Mayor the council is run like a dictatorship. None of the Labour 60 Ward Coucillors ever challenge the Mayor. Even the local paper the Newham Recorder, does not publish anything that offends the mayor of Newham, such is the grip....

There have been many contraversial decisions that have been forced through in Newham.

My advice to any loacl authority, wanting to take the Elected Mayoral route, is don't do it! You will turn your Council into a dictatorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.30.89 (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Directly elected mayors in England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Directly elected mayors in England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Directly elected mayors in England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Directly elected mayors in England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply