Talk:Disappearance of April Fabb
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can we unprotect this page now?
editI'm responding to a request by Ian on my talk page. He mentions that discussions have started and there's merit in unprotecting this pages. I seem to be agreeing with him. Yet, I'll await responses here over the next few hours before unprotecting. Thanks. Wifione Message 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- I just looked at Ian's Fabb proposal, and I have no BLP issue with it. Two things, though. First, not as many other editors have commented on it as did on the Tate proposal, probably because it didn't appear on this page and because the BLPN pointer just popped up (wasn't there last night while I was logged on). We might want to wait a bit for comments. Second, I'd reverse the order of the sentence about the similarity to the Tate disappearance. I'd word it, "The case of Genette Tate, who disappeared while riding a bike in Aylesbeare, Devon in 1978, is very similar to this case." The reason is the Tate case is later. It's a bit like saying a mother resembles her child instead of saying a child resembles the mother. The latter makes more sense. You might also consider adding an introductor phrase, "According to the police, ... --Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- No BLP issues equate to unprotection. So unprotected. Ask me for any future assistance. Kind regards. Wifione Message 03:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm happy to go ahead with the new version of this page. Best regards, David David J Johnson (talk) 10:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disappearance of April Fabb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160222205420/http://www.norfolk.police.uk/newsandevents/unsolvedcases/missingpersons/aprilfabb.aspx to http://www.norfolk.police.uk/newsandevents/unsolvedcases/missingpersons/aprilfabb.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)