Talk:Disappearance of Ben McDaniel
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disappearance of Ben McDaniel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Disappearance of Ben McDaniel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A question about wording
editIn the fourth paragraph in the section Disappearance of Ben McDaniel#Search is the following sentence:
- Most cave divers place their extra air tanks, which they need for decompression, at points along their route so they can follow it out, not at the entrance to the cave.
I've highlighted the pronoun "it" in bold. I would have thought that the pronoun should be "them" – "so they can follow them out" – where "them" refers to the "extra air tanks" placed along their route. Right now, with the singular "it", it sounds like it means, "so they can follow the route out. Does that makes sense you you? Follow the route? If that is what was meant, it would be better worded as "so they can find their way out". Corinne (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Corinne: You are correct. Thanks for looking and posing the question here. If i haven't made the edit before you come back, by all means do so. Daniel Case (talk) 01:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
John Bennett
editI feel like the Bennett link is a little misleading. Bennett was lost at sea, and is far from the first (or even first notable) diver for that to occur to. His death also is not an open question. I'd suggest deleting the link - in any case, it presumably should be within the other linked article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:246E:A129:9227:E4FF:FEF9:3A1C (talk) 05:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done The Bennett article is kind of short on information; I didn't know if it fit or not. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Rating assessment against B-class criteria
edit- 1 The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as
{{cite web}}
: Empty citation (help) is optional. - 2 The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
- 3 The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
- 4 The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
- 5 The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
- 6 The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
Objectivity
editCurrent: While he was initially believed to have drowned on that dive, and his parents still strongly believe his body is in an inaccessible reach of the extensive cave system, no trace of him has ever been found.[2][3] Despite this, the state of Florida issued his family a death certificate in 2013.[4]
Proposed: Although no trace of him has been found, he is believed to have drowned on that dive. His parents believe his body is in an inaccessible section of the extensive cave system. Regardless, the state of Florida issued his family a death certificate in 2013.[2][3][4]
Paul McDaniel's death
editPaul McDaniel's untimely death was not caused by a stroke, but by "multiple strokes following an opioid overdose," as was originally reported. The article excludes any mention of Paul's opioid use, possibly because the family omitted any potentially embarrassing information when discussing their son's death to the media. I believe it should be included. Dreamanderson (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, apparently Heinerth says that and shows the death certificate online in the documentary she made with her husband. If you or someone else have seen it and can provide enough information for a cite (see {{cite AV media}}), we can put that in (I haven't seen it, though of course I'd love to). Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- Daniel Case, okay, I found and watched the documentary and have made preliminary handwritten notes, with the times that each "event"/fact is presented. I've never referenced AV media. "Paul's death" information begins @1:16:55...autopsy results @1:17:27. Do I need to be this exact, or may I state 1:16:00 or 1:17:00? I want to do the right thing, in referencing. Seems best to start a bit before the ref, versus after. What do you advise?
- In addition to the autopsy... Of interest there are comments, made by Capt. Harry Hamilton, about the placement of the tanks, that are more specific than the print ref. I would like to include this information. And more... Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 06:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Storing a ref
editI am trying to consolidate some repeated refs. Storing this here for ease of access, while I work on the problem. Ben McDaniel [1]#comment-39523....
Found a new source, I think. Storing here: Experts Don't Believe Missing Diver is Actually in Cave at Vortex Springs? After hundreds of man-hours searching the cave, some are beginning to doubt McDaniel's body is inside. Experts cave divers say the evidence just isn't adding up. Posted: 10:26 PM Sep 13, 2010 Reporter: Meagan O'Halloran[2]
I have some of Shelby McDaniel's comments on this article in there. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- Daniel Case, yes, I *now* realize that they were all separate refs!! (Sorry) I have noted the specific cmt number so it reads "comment #xxx LeisurePro story" . Hope that's okay, to be more specific. Planning to follow up on my new source, above, but I am slow.... Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 05:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "What Happened to Ben McDaniel? Unanswered Questions - AquaViews". February 23, 2012.
- ^ [1]