Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2603:9001:18F0:79C0:ED58:C98:D161:4E7
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disney v. DeSantis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Why such an article like this is allowed with emotional languages? That makes it no longer simply reporting the truth but siding with one party. Wikipedia needs to extract those people out if they violate the neutrality of journalism. Otherwise, Wikipedia will stay as an entertainment source of information and serious researchers will not cite from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:18F0:79C0:ED58:C98:D161:4E7 (talk) 19:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Does anyone think that this section provides value? The first sentence about Reddit is uncited and, and the second sentence is about one random blog. Neither of which appear to be notable. EatTrainCode (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
