This seems like an acceptable to include in Wikipedia, but it needs some neutrality work, I think...maybe from someone who is familiar with the magazine?

  • Hi there! Although your changes were wise, and you have got rid of some of the uncompromised non-neutrality, there still exists quite a need for neutrality and a less unencyclopædic tone, because this article still sort of sounds like an advert for the magazine! I'll try to kill a few of those POVs in a minute!

Best wishes, It's is not a genitive/fala-me

Start a discussion about improving the Divanee Magazine page

Start a discussion