Talk:Diversionary foreign policy
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diversionary foreign policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020065956/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil:80/si/2004/may/bakerMay04.asp to http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2004/may/bakerMay04.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
lack of sources for claims
editI'm not disputing the claims, but there is no sources for a lot of the claims so it reads like original research. e.g. the "examples" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paintedxbird (talk • contribs) 00:31, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
I agree the examples section is poorly sourced. US intervention in Vietnam was not started to divert attention away from domestic issues during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations and I don't think any public figure has have ever made that claim. Conversely, the examples section does not include the Kosovo, Iraq, and Sudan interventions of 1998/1999, all of which were pushed by the Clinton Administration during Lewinsky Affair and his subsequent impeachment This has been pointed out by the New York Times, Alexander Cockburn and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C6:4300:2B77:FDCF:E69D:91FF:876D (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)