Talk:Diverticulum
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Diverticulum.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 July 2019 and 3 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tkguv. Peer reviewers: Carolyngeraci.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposed work plan for updating the Diverticulum page
editHi everyone I'm participating in the Osmosis Wikipedia editing course and would like to improve this article in the following ways:
1- Adding citations, this article has very few citations.
2- Moving the embryological section above the human pathology section so there is a flow from physiological to pathological.
3-Removing the "Anatomical" part as it seems out of place, and is a throwaway sentence. (please let me know if it's valuable and shouldn't be removed for some reason.)
4-Reformatting and possibly some editing of the "Human Pathology" section - depending on findings from collecting citations.
Comments and suggestions are welcome :) Tkguv (talk) 12:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
After looking at featured articles on the WikiProject: Anatomy, thinking of changing the "Human Pathology" section to : "Clinical Significance". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkguv (talk • contribs) 15:38, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hey Tkguv,
Introduction looks good! Nice summary and clears up any potential confusion between types of diverticula and normal vs pathologic. I might suggest including a few common types of diverticula in the intro (GI tract diverticula, mainly, since they are fairly common).
Classification and embryology sections make sense and are well-cited.
I agree with the use of bullet points when the information is a list (such as the embryological section). However, some of the bulleted lists might make more sense in paragraph form (such as the GI tract diverticula)
Maybe include a link to diverticulitis or diverticulosis at some point?
Carolyngeraci (talk) 01:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)carolyngeraci